Another indy. Kind of a weird format.
Anyways, finished 1st of 44. I'm very pumped. Of course, A) It will probably never happen again, and B) my opponents helped out a lot.
Really, I'm not sure I can take full credit for this.
On to the interesting hands.
Board 3:
West | North | East | South |
1♠ | p | 4♠ | X |
p | p | p |
Kudos to partner for leaving the double in, as this scored +1100, for a cool 90%.
Next hand:
Dealer | N | Vul | All | Scoring | Imp | Lead | ♦T |
| |
|
| | |
| |
|
West | North | East | South |
| p | p | 1♦ |
1♥ | p | 2♥ | X |
p | 3♦ | p | p |
4♥ | p | p | p |
|
Partner asked after the hand if I considered doubling. I did, and maybe it's right. I was concerned, though, that opponent was bidding based on a diamond void, in which case my hand was suddenly devalued. Turns out it was a singleton, and we collected 90% anyways.
Dealer | W | Vul | All | Scoring | Imp | Lead | ♣2 |
| |
|
| | |
| |
|
West | North | East | South |
1♣ | 1♦ | 1♥ | 1NT |
2♥ | 3♦ | p | p |
p |
This one was tough to bid. I'm not really sure I did it right, and was really unsure when we made +3. Fortunately, we took 75% anyways.
Dealer | N | Vul | E/W | Scoring | MP | Lead | ♥A |
| |
|
| | |
| |
|
West | North | East | South |
| 1♥ | 2NT | 3♠ |
4♣ | 4♥ | 5♣ | p |
p | p |
As soon as I bid 3 spades, it occurred to me that 4 spades was much better. We only scored 40% here - we needed to either bid 4 spades and play there, or double 5 clubs.
I think I should be the one to double 5 clubs, so I take all the blame here.
No comments:
Post a Comment